Charles v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Judge.
Marvin L. Charles Sr. was convicted of violating several state hunting regulations related to the taking of does on Prince of Wales Island. Charles argues that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing in district court to show that the hunting regulations were invalid because they conflicted with federal law requiring a priority for subsistence hunting. We uphold the district court’s decision to deny the hearing because Charles did not raise any factual dispute about the validity of the regulations.
Facts and proceedings
Charles was convicted of five counts of unlawful…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Totemoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Meier v. State, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Vigue v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Phillip v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2015
- Booth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
- Booth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
- Charles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
- State of Alaska v. Alisha Rosenbruch-Decker , State of Alaska v. Zachariah Brent DeckerCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025