Legal Opinion

Edwin J. Schoettle Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 12, 1928No. Docket No. 1941Published

The bond filed by the petitioner in connection with a claim in abatement does not operate to extend the statutory period of limitations for the assessment and collection of taxes. C. B. Shaffer,12 B.T.A. 298, and Gulf States Steel Co.,12 B.T.A. 1244, followed.

1Opinion of the Court

EDWIN J. SCHOETTLE CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Edwin J. Schoettle Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 1941.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

13 B.T.A. 950; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3125;

October 12, 1928, Promulgated

The bond filed by the petitioner in connection with a claim in abatement does not operate to extend the statutory period of limitations for the assessment and collection of taxes. C. B. Shaffer,12 B.T.A. 298, and Gulf States Steel Co.,12 B.T.A. 1244, followed.

Victor H. Blanc, Esq., for the petitioner.

J. A. O'Callaghan, Esq., for the respondent.

ARUNDELL

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  2. Edwin J. Schoettle Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API