Legal Opinion

Edwin J. Schoettle Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 12, 1928No. Docket No. 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The bond filed by the petitioner in connection with a claim in abatement does not operate to extend the statutory period of limitations for the assessment and collection of taxes. C. B. Shaffer,12 B.T.A. 298, and Gulf States Steel Co.,12 B.T.A. 1244, followed.

1Opinion of the Court

*952OPINION.

Arundell:

To the plea of the bar of the statute of limitation respondent has interposed the defense that the bond filed by petitioner with its claim in abatement is a consent in writing within the meaning of the taxing statute. This contention was ruled upon adversely by us in the case of C. B. Shaffer, 12 B. T. A. 298, and Gulf States Steel Co., 12 B. T. A. 1244. See also United States v. John Barth Co., 27 Fed. (2d) 782.

As a further defense respondent contends that petitioner’s return does not meet the requirements of section 13(b) of the Revenue Act of 1916, which was in effect at…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Edwin J. Schoettle Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API