Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Hill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1903No. Docket No. 9PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Certiorari to Wayne; Brooke, J. Mandamus by Ira M. Clarke to compel William H. Hill, secretary of the W. H. Hill Company, to transfer certain shares of stock. From an order granting the writ, respondent brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

Relator obtained a peremptory mandamus issued out of the circuit court requiring the respondent to transfer certain stock in a private corporation to the relator upon the books of the company. The learned circuit judge was of the opinion that, while there were other remedies, inasmuch as he was able to say that the right to the stock was clear, the writ should issue.

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, and is recognized as such. We have often held that it is inappropriate where there is another adequate remedy in law or in equity; and, as it is never supposed to be issued where there is not a…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Booker v. Grand Rapids Medical CollegeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Board of County Road Commissioners v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Keaton v. Village of Beverly HillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Goode v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Burg v. Milwaukee Medical CollegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API