Legal Opinion

Joseph v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 6, 1973No. Civ. A. No. 832-72PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GESELL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, supported by exhibits, affidavits, briefs, and after oral argument. Plaintiffs are riders of bicycles and motor scooters using the streets of the District of Columbia, who allege that the trolley tracks which the defendant D.C. Transit abandoned in the streets when it converted its transit system from trolley cars to buses, interfere with safe use of the streets, causing accidents and injuries. Originally brought as a class action, plaintiffs now proceed as individuals…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. District of Columbia v. CatonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1918
  3. Samuel Fisher, Mrs. Samuel Fisher v. Capital Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Husovsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  2. Joseph v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  3. Andrew A. Husovsky v. United States of America, the District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation. Andrew A. Husovsky v. United States of America. Appeal of the District of Columbia, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API