Legal Opinion

Samuel Fisher, Mrs. Samuel Fisher v. Capital Transit Company

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 16, 1957No. 13393_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURGER, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, husband and wife, sued appellee Transit Company for damages for personal injuries sustained by the husband who, while crossing a street, fell when he caught his foot in a hole located in or near appellee’s streetcar tracks. 1 The complaint alleges that appellee negligently failed to maintain its tracks and the area near the tracks in a reasonably safe condition and that the alleged existence of a hole constituted a nuisance. The District Court granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment and it is from this order that appellants appeal.

Appellants contend…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stephan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. District of Columbia v. Metropolitan RailroadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Hazen v. Washington Railway & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  4. Looney v. Metropolitan RailroadCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1905
  5. Ross v. Washington Railway & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. Allen Berenter, Allen Berenter v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Joseph v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. C.J. Community Services, Inc., Bridgeport, Washington v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API