Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Antoon v. Cleveland Clinic Found. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 2016No. 2015-0467Published

1Concurring in the judgmentPfeifer, J.

{¶ 36} All the glories of statutes of repose as described by the majority opinion point in one direction: toward protecting people who harm the despised proletariat, who are daring to remedy the wrong done them. Our original Constitution took a different stance. Even before Ohio’s statehood, the Constitutional Convention of 1802 guaranteed the right to a remedy for the portion of the Northwest Territory that would become Ohio. Article VIII, Section 7, Constitution of 1802. Phillips, The Constitutional Right to a Remedy, 78 N.Y.U.L.Rev. 1309, 1316 (2003), fn. 30. See also E.W. Scripps Co. v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Mominee v. ScherbarthOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Groch v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Gentile v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API