Johnnie Lintond Tillis v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2
1. The sole contention in this 2255 proceeding was that the trial judge in effect promised the movant probation if he would plead guilty. This is refuted by the transcript of the proceedings in open court, by the “court’s own recollection” as stated in the trial judge’s order, and by affidavits of the movant’s former counsel and of the U. S. Attorney. While we have held, Powers v. United States, 5 Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 22; Martin v. United States, 5 Cir. 1971, 447 F.2d 985 that controverted issues of fact in Section 2255 proceedings may not be adjudicated on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 990Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. John David WoodallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Archie Raymond Streator v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Carl William Powers v. United States of America, No. 71-1352. Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409 Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by4 opinions
- Donald Lee Forrester v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Richard Montgomery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Paul Braxton Owens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Henry Reed v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976