Legal Opinion
People v. Pablo C.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 22, 1982No. Civ. 24815PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, J.
Pablo C., a minor, appeals the order declaring him to be a ward of the court. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 800.) The question pre*987sented is the effect of the presumed taint of a non-Mirandized1 confession on a later Mirandized confession. As we shall explain, we have concluded there is insufficient evidence to support a factual finding that Pablo’s later confession was obtained in a manner and under circumstances which removed the illegality resulting from the failure to have given Pablo a Miranda warning when he was first interrogated We therefore reverse the order.
Factual and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. McWhorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. CelayaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.