Legal Opinion

People v. Celaya

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1987No. H000785PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PHILLIPS, J.*

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of grand theft. Following denial of defendant’s in limine motion to exclude his confession, defendant waived trial by jury and agreed to submit the matter on the transcript of the preliminary hearing. It was agreed the defendant’s maximum sentence would be two years in state prison if found guilty. Defendant reserved his appeal right including that relating to his motion to exclude the confession. Defendant was found guilty by the court and was thereafter sentenced to a two-year term in state prison.

Defendant’s only…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. People v. DisbrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. ManisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. StansburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. AguileraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Alward v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. GormanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API