Legal Opinion

Puett v. Harvey

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1928No. 2764PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Ducker, J.:

This is an action to quiet title to certain mining-ground situated in Rochester mining district in Pershing County, Nevada. The complaint alleges that plaintiff located two lode mining claims known as and named South Extension No. 1 and South Extension No. 6,- the former on the 27th day of November, 1915, and the latter on the 5th day of July, 1924, and subsequently fully performed all acts necessary to complete valid locations of said claims.

In their answer defendants deny the validity of the lode mining locations alleged in the complaint. It is affirmatively…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Noyes v. CliffordMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Dutertre v. ShallenbergerNevada Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Mt. Rosa Mining, Milling & Land Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  4. Edwards v. JonesNevada Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Inyo Marble Co. v. LoundaginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API