Legal Opinion

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Eyett

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 2, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kaufman, S.:

Surrogates’ Courts are only too frequently confronted by cases indicating a tendency on the part of many persons about to make testamentary dispositions of their possessions to rely upon their own slight and faulty knowledge of such matters rather than to avail themselves of the knowledge and experience of well-qualified legal practitioners. It seems remarkable that so many people, who carefully plan, industriously work and thriftily save for years to accumulate competences for their families, will, when their aims are realized financially, jeopardize the entire undertakings and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brown v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. In Re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of TurellNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. In re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of AkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. In Re the Probate of the Will of FieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gardner v. BalboniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. In re the Estate of ZaiacNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  3. In re the Estate of DawleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. Tonneson v. TonnesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API