Legal Opinion

Pickens v. . Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1880PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Civil action upon an administration bond tried at June Special Term, 1880, of Henderson Superior Court, before Schenck, J. The defendants appealed from the judgment rendered.

1Opinion of the CourtAshe, J.

This is a civil action brought by the plaintiff (relator) against the defendants as sureties upon the admin* islration bond of John D. Hyman, as administrator of W> F. Taylor, deceased.

The complaint substantially alleges that W. P. Taylor died intestate in the county of Henderson; that on the 10th day of September,. 1873, the said Hyman was duly qualified as his administrator, and together with the defendants executed and delivered to the probate judge of said county his bond in the penal sum of five thousand dollars conditioned for the faithful discharge of his duties as administrator j that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lusk v. . ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. Blossom v. . Van Amringe and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1868
  3. Hughes v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  4. Moore v. BoudinotSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Keener v. . GoodsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. FlemingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Thompson v. DekumOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. In re the Estate of DelaneyNevada Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State Ex Rel. Enyart v. DoudMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API