Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Enyart v. Doud

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Headnote 1. Descent and Distribution, 18 C.J., Section 133; 2. Conversion, 13 C.J., Section 55; 3. Executors and Administrators, 24 C.J., Section 2562; 4. Executors and Administrators, 24 C.J., Section 1733; 5. Descent and Distribution, 18 C.J., Section 179; Executors and Administrators, 24 C.J., Section 1385; 6. Executors and Administrators, 24 C.J., Section 2539 (1926 Anno); 7. Executors and Administrators, 24 C.J., Section 2533; 8. Executors and Administrators, 24 C.J., Section 2539. This action is upon the bond of the administrator de bonis noncum testamento annexo of the estate of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Scofield v. . ChurchillNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. State ex rel. Wolff v. BerningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Fiscus v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Elizalde v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Foster v. PotterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. KinnerkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Estate of Poe v. PoeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  3. Crooks v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  4. Old v. HeibelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  5. Bryant v. GreenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API