Legal Opinion

Best v. Tavenner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1950PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Circuit Court in favor of the plaintiff, which was entered in an action instituted by her to recover damages for personal injury and property hurt suffered in a collision between the plaintiff’s automobile and one driven by the defendant. The amount of the attacked judgment is $5,500, plus costs. The judgment was based upon a verdict.

The appellant (defendant) presents two assignments of error. The first is:

“The Court erred in striking the testimony of Dr. Gussie A. Niles from the record and in instructing the jury as follows:
“ ‘The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. ManchettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hoag v. Washington-Oregon Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State v. BighamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Richardson v. Portland Trackless Car Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Henderson v. Twin Falis CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons, United States of America and Shalom Baby WearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. State v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Phillips v. CreightonOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Boyle v. COTTRELLOregon Supreme Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API