Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Campbell

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided April 20, 2016No. Case No. 1:16-cv-294PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT J. JONKER, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a habeas corpus action brought by a state prisoner under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Promptly after the filing of a petition for habeas corpus, the Court must undertake a preliminary review of the petition to determine whether “it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; see 28 U.S.C. § 2243. If so, the petition must be summarily dismissed. Rule 4; see Allen v. Perini, 424 F.2d 134, 141 (6th…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bartee 898158 v. MorrisonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023
  2. Bartee 898158 v. MorrisonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023
  3. Coker v. StephensonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  4. Demario T. Simpson v. Paul SchreiberDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  5. Hazel Janae Cooper v. Jeremy HowardDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API