Legal Opinion

Karpati v. Cambria Steel Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 1918No. Appeal, No. 65PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal, No. 65, April T., 1918, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Columbia Co., Dec. T., 1916, No. 470, dismissing appeal from judgment of Workmen’s Compensation Board in Case of Jolande Karpati v. Cambria Steel Co. Appeal from judgment of Workmen’s Compensation Board. The question turned on whether the claimant, the widow of Jacob Karpati was living with her husband at the time of his death, or whether she was actually dependent on him at that time.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 65, April T., 1918, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Columbia Co., Dec. T., 1916, No. 470, dismissing appeal from judgment of Workmen’s Compensation Board in Case of Jolande Karpati v. Cambria Steel Co. Appeal from judgment of Workmen’s Compensation Board. The question turned on whether the claimant, the widow of Jacob Karpati was living with her husband at the time of his death, or whether she was actually dependent on him at that time. The evidence is summarized in the opinion of the Superior Court. • Error assigned was order dismissing claimant’s appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

Section 409 of the Employer’s Liability Act of 1915, provides that the board’s findings of fact shall in all cases be final but on a question of law an appeal may be taken to the courts as in the act provided. No provision is made for bringing up the testimony by a bill sealed, a certified record or otherwise. The appeal to the Court of Common Pleas is, therefore, in the nature of a certiorari, all questions of fact being left to the final determination of the compensation board. While the review by an appellate court on a writ of certiorari ordinarily only extends to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Independence Party NominationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. In re Franklin Film Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Creasy v. Phœnix Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Dietrich v. Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Hallman v. Starr Printing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Koeppel v. E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1936
  5. Koeppel v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API