State v. Hixson

This is the third time that this cause has been before this court on appeal. The prior decisions are found in 202 Iowa 431 and 205 Iowa 1321. We deem it unnecessary to reiterate the facts, as they are sufficiently recited in the foregoing decisions. The opinion in State v. Hixson, 202 Iowa 431, contains this statement: ‘‘ The fraud perpetrated on Singleton was gross.”

In the instant case, there is no challenge to the indictment or the instructions, nor is the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict presented by the appellant. The propositions outlined and argued by…