Legal Opinion

State v. Bird

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 26, 1928PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoruing, J.

— The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain conviction is conceded. A review is called for only to the extent necessary for the proper consideration of-appellant’s claim that he did not rely upon an alibi as a defense, and thát the court erred in telling the jury that one of his defenses was an alibi.

I. The forgery alleged was the signing of the name of John Feaster to a receipt for a telegraphic remittance to Feaster of $30. This remittance was telegraphed from Eichland Center, Wisconsin, to the Marquette Savings Bank, at-Marquette," Iowa, January 13, 1927. The State’s evidence was, in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. State v. KendallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. State v. IcenbiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. State v. WorthenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. State v. BoydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. DunneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. Gale H. Johnson v. John E. Bennett, Warden, Iowa State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. State v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. State v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  5. State v. SteffenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API