Legal Opinion

Pollock v. Connecticut Fire Insurance

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1935No. 23237. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shaw

M. D. Pollock and his wife, Emma Miles Pollock, as joint tenants, owned certain real estate in Decatur which was improved with a dwelling house and occupied by them as a homestead. Title in joint tenancy had been acquired by them by warranty deed December 27, 1922, and that title continued during all of the times herein referred to. In 1927 Pollock obtained a policy of insurance from the appellee, covering, among other hazards, loss or damage by lightning. The record is silent as to anything concerning the issuance of this policy. In October of 1930 a renewal of this policy for a new and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Columbian Insurance Co. of Alexandria v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Syndicate Ins. v. BohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  4. Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Feder v. Midland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pittway Corp. v. American Motorists InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Stoltz v. National Indemnity Co. of OmahaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  3. Mortell v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Beddow v. HicksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  5. Howard Foundry Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API