Legal Opinion

Shumpert v. Time Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 12, 1998No. 2782PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Judge:

This appeal concerns a claim for subrogation by a health insurance provider against an insured’s recovery from a third-party tortfeasor. At issue is whether the insurer is entitled to subrogation when the health insurance policy does not contain a subrogation clause as provided by S.C.Code Ann. § 38-71-190 (Supp.1996). The circuit court held a health insurer may still recover under the theory of equitable subrogation in the absence of an express contractual provision for subrogation. The court denied the Shumperts’ claim for bad faith. We affirm in part and reverse in part. 1

FA…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Koester v. Carolina Rental Center, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Cunningham v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Michigan Hospital Service v. SharpeMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Frost v. Porter Leasing Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Kreutner v. DavidSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kuznik v. Bees Ferry AssociatesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Perreira v. RedigerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Unisun Insurance v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Reliance InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
  5. Wolters v. American Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API