Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stavredes v. United Skates of America, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 2, 1982Published

1Dissent

Kupferman, J. P.,

dissents in a memorandum as follows: I dissent and would affirm. The Judge at Special Term did not abuse his discretion. (See Westwood Assoc. v Deluxe Gen., 53 NY2d 618.) He stated specifically: “While venue in New York is not improper, the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice will be promoted by a change of venue.” The opinion of the majority is simply another imposition on the judicial system of additional unneeded work. No wonder, with this kind of approach the Chief Justice of the United States proposes arbitration to solve disputes. (See Chief Justice…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westwood Associates v. Deluxe General, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Pentifallo v. Hilton of Panama, S. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API