Westwood Associates v. Deluxe General, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action on grounds of forum non conveniens. That all of the parties to the action may have been New York residents is not dispositive, since the residence of the parties in New York is but one factor to be considered in determining whether an action should be dismissed pursuant to CPLR 327 (see Silver v Great Amer. Ins. Co., 29 NY2d 356; see, generally, Irrigation & Ind. Dev. Corp. v Indag, S. A., 37 NY2d 522).
Chief Judge Cooke…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Silver v. Great American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Irrigation & Industrial Development Corp. v. Indag S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Broida v. BancroftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Rosenberg v. Stikeman Elliott, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Katz v. NVF Co.New York Supreme Court · 1983
- Brandon v. ChefetzNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Frontier Manufacturing, Inc. v. Comp-Aire Sys., Inc./JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.