Legal Opinion

Schroedl v. McTague

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 9, 1964No. 51223PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiffs on October 5, 1961, filed their action against the defendants seeking judgment on a promissory note alleged to have been signed and delivered on January 25, 1947. The note was in the principal sum of $10,000, with several years accrued interest. The defendants answered, raising among other defenses that of the statute of limitations. At the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence the trial court granted defendants’ motion for a peremptory verdict. From judgment on the verdict the plaintiffs, being understandably not in agreement therewith, have appealed.

'In their petition, as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Watson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. In Re Estate of StratmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Baker v. KirwinNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Reynolds v. Denver & Rio Grande Western R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  5. Wentland v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shinrone, Inc. v. Tasco, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. Pear v. Grand Forks Motel AssociatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Schroedl v. McTagueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. Schroedl v. McTagueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. Schroedl v. McTagueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API