Legal Opinion

Richmond, Fredericksburg and Potomac Railroad Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1975No. 74--2146PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:

The Railroad, issuer of old hybrid securities, sought certain income tax advantages bottomed upon the claim that the securities are bonds. While they have some of the attributes of bonds, they also have attributes of common stock. The Tax Court held that with respect to the transactions involved, the securities should be treated as equity capital. Since the transactions themselves were oriented to those features attributable to common stock, we affirm.

In the last half of the last century, Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad issued several series of hybrid…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Richmond, F. & P. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  2. Roberts & Porter, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
  3. H. And G. Industries, Inc. And Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  4. Jim Walter Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Head Ski Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Markham & Brown, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Frederick Weisman Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
  3. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. Dietzsch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  5. United States v. CorrarDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API