Legal Opinion

State v. Loranger

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 20, 2001No. 00-3364-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

¶ 1. Jeffrey Loranger appeals from a judgment of conviction for manufacturing a controlled substance, maintaining a building for the use of manufacturing controlled substances, and possessing a firearm as a felon. He filed a motion to suppress evidence seized at his home under a search warrant, which the circuit court denied. There are two primary issues. The first is whether suppression of evidence is the proper remedy when police performed a thermal image scan on Loranger's home without a warrant, relying in good faith upon our decision in State v. McKee, 181 Wis. 2d 354, 510 N.W.2d 807…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. State v. HillaryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
  3. Loranger v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API