Legal Opinion

Mather-Klock, Inc. v. Plymire

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1944No. Appeal, 29PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Cpiiee Justice Maxey,

This is an appeal from the decree of the court below dissolving a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff brought a bill to restrain the defendant’s alleged trespassing over plaintiff’s land, “both on foot and by automobile”. It was alleged that the trespasses were “almost daily” and “without the shadow of right” and that they interfere with the plaintiff’s “use and cultivation of the said field”. In plaintiff-appellant’s history of the case it is stated that “the use of the disputed way as an accommodation and a short-cut was occasional, intermittent and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garrett v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  2. Wedge Et Ux. v. Schrock Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wampler v. ShenkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Loudenslager v. MostellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Predwitch v. CHROBAK Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Steel v. YocumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Brown v. McConnellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API