Legal Opinion

Amanda Sue Smith v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 23, 2017No. 16-17425PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANTOON, District Judge:

Amanda Sue Smith filed, a three-count complaint against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) seeking damages arising from a soured business arrangement she entered into with an FBI confidential informant. The district court granted the United States’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, finding that Smith’s claims had no basis under Georgia law and thus could not support FTCA liability. After careful review of the briefs and controlling law, and having the benefit of oral argument, we affirm.

I

Smith’s claims arise out of a peculiar…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Bradley Center, Inc. v. WessnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Carlos Zelaya v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  4. City of Rome v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  5. Douglas Asphalt Co. v. Qore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Alieda Maron v. Chief Financial Officer of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
  2. O'Neill v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  3. Appleby v. Knauf Gips KGDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023
  4. Appleby v. Knauf Gips KGDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023
  5. Avini Health Corporation v. BioGenus LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API