Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kanatser v. Chrysler Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 19, 1953No. 4434_1Published

1DissentBratton, Circuit Judge

Unable to concur in the conclusion of the majority that the action of the district court in granting a new trial should be reviewed on certiorari, I note without extended discussion the grounds of my dissent.

It is well settled that under section 1651 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, this court has jurisdiction to issue writs of certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition. These writs are issued or withheld in the sound judicial discretion of the court, and they are usually denied where another adequate remedy is available. The traditional use of the writs has been in appropriate cases to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Ex Parte Republic of PeruSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States Alkali Export Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Marshall's U. S. Auto Supply, Inc. v. CashmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  5. Willoughby v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API