Legal Opinion
Cheung v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 17, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from *670an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.), entered June 7, 1993, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with General Municipal Law § 50-e.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On the eve of trial, the court dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint based on a finding that the notice of claim was not sufficiently specific to satisfy the requirements of General Municipal Law § 50-e (2) (3) regarding "the place where and the manner in which the claim…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Mojica v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Cappadonna v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Mitchell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Frazer v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- Whitfield v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Santiago v. New York City HousIng AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- LaBorde v. Most Service Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000