Muffin Miles v. Robert Dickson, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Pursuant to a memorandum opinion reported in 40 F.R.D. 386-391, the district court rendered summary judgment for the defendants, and taxed the court costs against the plaintiffs’ attorneys.
The voluminous record and the many depositions convince us that the district court was clearly correct in concluding that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that each of the defendants was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P.
We are equally convinced that the plaintiffs’ attorneys acted in good faith, upon written authorization from their clients, and that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Miles v. DicksonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1966
3Cited by16 opinions
- George BADILLO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CENTRAL STEEL & WIRE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Amlong & Amlong, PA v. Denny's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Amlong & Amlong, P.A. v. Denny's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Julian Encina v. Tony Lama Boot Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Victor Lepucki v. Bernard L. Van Wormer, Kenneth Pazdur v. Blaw-Knox Foundry and Mill MacHineryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.