Legal Opinion
Swenk v. Asbury
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County
Decided June 19, 2003No. 03-3769PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LASH, J.,
The matter before this court is a dispute over entitlement to legal fees between intervenors, Mark A. Verlin, Esquire, and Verlin Law Offices, the former counsel of petitioners, Ralph W. Swenk Jr., a *393minor, by Wanda D. Hall and Ralph W. Swenk Sr., his parents and natural guardians, and Wanda D. Hall and Ralph W. Swenk Sr., in their own right and petitioners’ current counsel, James M. Potter, Esquire, and Liever, Hyman and Potter PC. The fees at issue, totaling $28,750, accrued as a result of settlement of the personal injury claims of Ralph W. Swenk Jr. (Billy Swenk). The gross…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Feingold v. PucelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Equibank v. Adle, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Wecorp, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012