Legal Opinion
In Re Roy J. Elizondo III v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided March 7, 2024No. 13-23-00376-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
NUMBER 13-23-00376-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE ROY J. ELIZONDO III On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Tijerina, Silva, and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña1 Relator Roy J. Elizondo III filed a petition for writ of mandamus through which he contends that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his Rule 306a motion regarding untimely notice of an order. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a(4), (5). We dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. 1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re the Lynd Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- John v. Marshall Health Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Moore Landrey, L.L.P. v. Hirsch & Westheimer, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.