Legal Opinion

In Re the Lynd Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 2006No. 05-0432PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson

In this mandamus action, we consider whether a court may imply the date on which a complaining party received late notice of judgment from an order granting a motion to extend post-judgment deadlines pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 306a. Rule 306a allows for extensions of post-judgment deadlines when a party first receives notice of a judgment more than twenty, but less than ninety-one, days after it is signed. Tex R. Civ. P. 306a(4). Relator The Lynd Company (Lynd) seeks a writ of mandamus that (1) compels the court of appeals to vacate its order directing the trial court to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of McAllen, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Memorial Hospital of Galveston County v. GillisTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. John v. Marshall Health Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Myrad Properties, Inc. v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Florance v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  3. Orgoo, Inc. v. Rackspace US, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  4. United Residential Properties, L.P., William Maxwell and Tiffany Tallent v. Tom and Dwana Theis, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  5. Nedd-Johnson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API