Legal Opinion

Cates v. Shlemovitz

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided April 27, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00805Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CAMERON CATES, Plaintiff, -against- 3:21-CV-0805 (LEK/ML) JARED SHLEMOVITZ,d/b/a JUNTO SOUNDS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Cameron Cates, proceeding pro se, brings this action against defendants Jared Shlemovitz, (doing business as Junto Sounds), Procter & Gamble Corporation, (doing business as Febreeze), Grey Advertising Corporation (“Grey”), and WPP Group USA Incorporated (collectively “Defendants”), alleging that Defendants infringed Plaintiff’s copyright on a work that Plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Vega v. Hempstead Union Free School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API