Madsen v. Brown
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentStewart, Justice
The majority holds that a duly elected mayor of a city may be removed from office by a court decree because he shot and killed a dog that had been running loose in the city. Utah Code Ann., 1953, § 77-6-1, which the majority holds authorizes that result, was never intended, in my view, to permit a court to nullify an election on such flimsy grounds. Because the Court construes § 77-6-1 to permit a handful of citizens to override the voice of the majority on such frivolous grounds, I dissent.
Section 77-6-1, which is part of the criminal procedure code, provides for the removal of individuals…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hardie v. ColemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Law, Co. v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1908
- Mayor of Macon v. ShawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- State ex rel. Martin v. BurnquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- State ex rel. Stokes v. Probate CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.