Legal Opinion · Dissent

Madsen v. Brown

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1985No. 19478Published

1DissentStewart, Justice

The majority holds that a duly elected mayor of a city may be removed from office by a court decree because he shot and killed a dog that had been running loose in the city. Utah Code Ann., 1953, § 77-6-1, which the majority holds authorizes that result, was never intended, in my view, to permit a court to nullify an election on such flimsy grounds. Because the Court construes § 77-6-1 to permit a handful of citizens to override the voice of the majority on such frivolous grounds, I dissent.

Section 77-6-1, which is part of the criminal procedure code, provides for the removal of individuals…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hardie v. ColemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. Law, Co. v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Mayor of Macon v. ShawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  4. State ex rel. Martin v. BurnquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. State ex rel. Stokes v. Probate CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API