Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Henley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 3, 1999No. S98Y1474PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Following disciplinary proceedings, the review panel recommended that Frederick Joseph Henley, Jr. be disbarred for several violations of bar rules arising out of his participation in an insurance fraud scheme. Henley contends that the production of documents during the disciplinary proceedings violated his constitutional rights. We disagree and conclude that disbarment is the appropriate sanction.

In its formal complaint, the State Bar alleged that Henley represented persons who falsely claimed they had been in automobile accidents and were seeking insurance payments for personal injuries and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. In re FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. In Matter of Robert A. MeierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  5. Matter of HenleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. U-HAUL COMPANY OF ARIZONA Et Al. v. RUTLAND Et Al. and Vice Versa.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  2. in the Matter of Laxavier P. Reddick-HoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  3. In the Matter of Sherri JeffersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  4. In THE MATTER OF GRADY ALEXANDER ROBERTS III (Four Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  5. Dempsey v. Kaminski Jewelry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API