Legal Opinion

Consolidated System, Inc. v. Ting

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided June 6, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 84-3064-15Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HAMILTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Consolidated Systems, Inc. (“CSI”), a South Carolina corporation, initiated this civil action against defendant Raymond M.L. Ting dba Advanced Engineering Services (“Ting”), a citizen of Pennsylvania, seeking, inter alia, a declaration that two steel decks it intends to manufacture do not infringe the U.S. Patent No. 4,453,364 dated June 12, 1984 for “Corrugated Steel Decking Section” (“Ting Patent”).

Subject matter jurisdiction is not contested and arises under the patent laws, 35 *143U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. A…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Peter M. Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  4. Frank W. Butler and Catalina Yachts, Inc., a California Corporation v. Jack A. Helms, D/B/A Jack A. Helms CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  5. Franklin D. Ebeling, Ernest C. Ebeling and Ebeling Manufacturing Corporation v. Pak-Mor Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API