Legal Opinion

Strunk v. E. D. Huffman & Sons

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1941No. Appeal, 43PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is a workmen’s compensation case.. The appeal involves the question whether the claimant’s husband was in the course of his employment when fatally injured. Claimant, on behalf of herself and her two minor children under sixteen years of age, filed a claim petition in which she set forth that her husband, Mitchell Strunk, was fatally injured as the result of an accident occurring in the course of his employment with E., D. Huffman & Sons on October 14, 1937. An answer was filed in which it was denied that deceased was in the course of his employment at the time of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Paulin v. Williams Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Feeney v. N. Snellenburg & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Granville v. Scranton Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Paulin v. Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Epler v. North American Rockwell Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Wolsko v. American Bridge Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Haas v. Brotherhood of Transportation WorkersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Hesselman v. Somerset Community HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Giallonardo v. St. Joseph's CollegeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API