Legal Opinion
Huntsville Utilities v. CONSOLIDATED CONST.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 5, 2003No. 1020195PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Application for Rehearing
The opinion of May 23, 2003, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.
Huntsville Utilities, John Thomas, and Jimmy Stanley appeal from the denial of their motion to compel Consolidated Construction Company ("CCC") to arbitrate its claims against them. We reverse and remand.
Facts
On October 19, 1999, CCC and Huntsville Utilities entered into an agreement entitled "Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor where the basis of payment is a Stipulated Sum."1 Pursuant to that agreement, CCC was to serve as the general contractor for renovations…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- SouthTrust Bank v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Edwards v. CostnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Steele v. WalserSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Allied Williams Companies, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- McKAY BLDG. CO., INC. v. JulianoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.