Legal Opinion
Richman v. Juras
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 29, 1975No. Civ. 74-918PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Plaintiffs, welfare recipients, seek declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated against the Oregon Public Welfare Division, its Administrator, the Oregon Department of Human Resources, and its Director. Jurisdiction is conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and (4).
Plaintiffs stipulated at the hearing that they seek only prospective relief. They agreed that any decision we reached regarding the bulletin would have virtually the same effect as a class action. Hence, they did not press…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Townsend v. SwankSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hayes v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Lumpkin v. Department of Social ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lumpkin v. Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Tavarez v. SipprellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Hayes v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.