Legal Opinion
Shinall v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 20, 1932No. 12,776PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
These parties appeared in the trial court in the same order as here and for convenience we refer to them as plaintiff and defendant.
Plaintiff was beneficiary in a life insurance policy for $1,000 which her husband held in defendant company. At the time of his death a premium was due. The company claims, and plaintiff denies, that the period of grace provided for in the contract had then expired. The action was one to reform the policy as to date, and as reformed, enforce its payment. A general demurrer to the amended complaint was sustained. Plaintiff elected to stand, and to review the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Halsey v. American Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- McConnell v. Provident Savings Life Assur. Soc. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Stinchcombe v. New York Life Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Western Assurance Co. v. BronsteinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lentin v. Continental Assurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Columbian National Life Insurance v. McClainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. Jeffries-Eaves, Inc., of Colo.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Stramaglia v. Conservative Life Insurance Co. of WheelingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
- Johnson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.