Legal Opinion

Matthew Eason, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. George L. Weaver, Defendant-Appellant-Cross

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 19, 1973No. 73-1833PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This automobile accident diversity case was tried before the court without a jury and a judgment for the plaintiff Eason was entered in the amount of $195,922.00. The defendant Weaver appealed and argues that, under Georgia law, the district court held him to an improperly high standard of care. Ea-son cross-appealed and asserts that the amount of the judgment is insufficient. We affirm.

The only question with which we must concern ourselves on the main appeal is whether Eason was an invitee in the car rented by Weaver and thus Weaver owed him a duty of ordinary care, or whether Eason was a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. DilbeckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Nash v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. Scarborough v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jerry Wayne Davis v. Hill Engineering, Inc. And Williams-Mcwilliams Co., Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. Higginbotham v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Minnie E. Pittman v. James O. Gilmore, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Matthew Eason v. George L. Weaver v. Reserve Insurance Company, Garnishee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Kratzer v. Capital Marine Supply, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API