In Re Logan

Pee Cueiam.

On May 13, 1976 this court filed its opinion discharging a disciplinary order to show cause against respondent with respect to one ethical charge and reprimanding him on another. 70 N. J. 222. The second charge was identified as the Liddell matter. In that matter the court found that respondent had been responsible for a “misrepresentation to his client”, which, together with “his failure to ascertain the facts and his overall carelessness”, warranted the limited discipline imposed. Id. at 238.

Subsequently the court granted a motion by respondent for a rehearing. We so acted on the…