Quick v. State

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-Appellant H.M.J. Quick appeals his conviction of two counts of dealing in a schedule I controlled substance, a class B felony. 1

We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

ISSUES

The Defendant raises four issues for our review which we rephrase as: 2

1. Did the State present sufficient evidence of Quick's predisposition to sell a controlled substance to overcome his entrapment defense?

2. Did Quick's convictions violate the prohibition against double jeopardy?

3. Did the trial court err by refusing to give Quick's tendered instruction?

FACTS…