Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. National Bank of Commerce

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 1923No. 14219PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

The National Bank of Commerce, as plaintiff, began this action against B. B. Bell, as maker of a promissory note, and Wade Alexander and T.' B. Pick-ens as indorsers thereon. Bell filed an answer and cross-petition against Alexander and Pickens, and also made HApkins a party and¡ asked for judgment against Alexander, Pickens, and Hopkins. Judgment was recovered by the National Bank of Commerce against all of the parties and by Bell against Hopkins and Pickens, from which judgment Hopkins and Pickens, have appealed. The note sued on by the plaintiff was executed by Bell to Pickens, and Pickens…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cobb v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Flowers v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Hotel Tulsa Tailors v. Tulsa Industrial Loan & Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API