Legal Opinion · Dissent

Presley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1988No. 15177, 15188Published

1DissentMaus, Judge

I dissent. I do so for two reasons. First, I do not believe the movant has shown “a reasonable probability” that but for the error of counsel the result of his trial would have been different as required by Strickland. Second, I believe that the movant waived the right to assert ineffective assistance of counsel by reason of that error.

The applicability of the principles upon which each of these reasons is based depends upon the extent of the infringement of the constitutional right involved. The failure of counsel to challenge juror Cates for cause is the infringement involved. That failure…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API