Legal Opinion

Norwest Bank Wisconsin Eau Claire, N.A. v. Plourde

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 3, 1994No. 93-2650PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.

Michael and Janet Plourde appeal a foreclosure judgment granted to Norwest Bank Wisconsin Eau Claire. Plourde contends that he was entitled to a jury trial as a matter of right because he was compelled to assert his counterclaims against Norwest in the foreclosure action or be subject to collateral estoppel. We conclude that Plourde was entitled to a jury trial as a matter of right because he would have been collaterally estopped from asserting certain of his claims of bad faith breach of the loan agreements against Norwest in a separate action. While an advisory jury was empaneled, counsel…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  2. Landwehr v. Citizens Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hansher v. KaishianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Loehrke v. Wanta Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  5. Post v. SchwallCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lyn-Anna Properties, Ltd. v. Harborview Development Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Dane County v. McGrewWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Farr v. Alternative Living Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  4. Palmerton v. Associates' Health & Welfare PlanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  5. Dane County v. McGrewWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API