Legal Opinion

In re Granick

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 20, 2019No. Case No. 16-mc-80206-PJHPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, United States District Judge

On May 8, 2019, the court held a hearing on (1) the motion of petitioners Jennifer Granick and Riana Pfefferkorn ("Petitioners") for de novo determination of dispositive matter referred to magistrate judge, *1112pursuant to Civil L.R. 72-3, and objections to the December 18, 2018, report and recommendation ("R&R") of the magistrate judge to deny their petition to unseal technical assistance orders and materials ("Petition"); and (2) Petitioners' motion for an evidentiary hearing. Dkt. nos. 62, 63. For the reasons stated on the record and set forth…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aspalathos Investments, LLC v. Circle Internet Financial, LLC, John Does 1–10, including John Doe, the current owner, operator, or controller of Ethereum wallet address 0xf70da97812CB96acDF810712Aa562db8dfA3dbEFDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API