Legal Opinion

Holland v. the State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 23, 2015No. A15A1301PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLINGTON, Presiding Judge.

A Gwinnett County jury found Daunte Holland guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of trafficking in cocaine, OCGA § 16-13-31 (a); and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, OCGA § 16-13-30 (j) (1), in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Following the denial of his motion for a new trial, Holland appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and contending that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. For the reasons explained below, we reverse.

1. Holland contends that the State failed to adduce any evidence connecting him to the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Rankin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  3. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  4. Stacey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  5. Whitfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gilbert Alexander Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
  2. Rogelio Portillo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API